Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 51.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 43.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 42.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN LANKENAU Board President
MELINDA VARGA Board President
KATHLEEN MARSH Board President
SONYA KIM Treasurer
ALEX SHAPIRO Board Member
DANIEL DORFF Board Member
DAVID FLACHS Board Member
DEMETRIUS ROBINSON Board Member
DENNIS TOBENSKI Board Member
GEORGE MALOIAN Board Member
IAN MCLOUGHLIN Board Member
JAMES GRUPENHOFF Board Member
JEFF SCHROEDL Board Member
JOHN SHORNEY Board Member
KAREN HEYMANN Board Member
MARCO BERROCAL Board Member
MATTHEW KEISER Board Member
MEGHAN ROY CLEGG Board Member
NORMAN RYAN Board Member
PEGGY MONASTRA Board Member
STEPHEN CULBERTSON Board Member
KATHRYN KNIGHT Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN LANKENAU Board President
MENDY VARGA Board President
KATHLEEN MARSH Board President
SONYA KIM Treasurer
KATHRYN KNIGHT Secretary
ALEX SHAPIRO Board Member
DANIEL DORFF Board Member
DAVID FLACHS Board Member
DEMETRIUS ROBINSON Board Member
DENNIS TOBENSKI Board Member
GEORGE MALOIAN Board Member
IAN MCLOUGHLIN Board Member
JAMES GRUPENHOFF Board Member
JEFF SCHROEDL Board Member
JOHN SHORNEY Board Member
KAREN HEYMANN Board Member
MARCO BERROCAL Board Member
MATTHEW KEISER Board Member
NORMAL RYAN Board Member
STEPHEN CULBERTSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SEAN PATRICK FLAHAVEN Board President
ROBERT THOMPSON Board President
KATHLEEN MARSH Board President
SONYA KIM Treasurer
TODD VUNDERINK Secretary
KATHLEEN FERNANDES Board Member
MATTHEW KEISER Board Member
JEFF SCHROEDL Board Member
MENDY VARGA Board Member
MARCO BERROCAL Board Member
DANIEL DORFF Board Member
EUGENE CAPRIOGLIO Board Member
CAROL CUELLAR Board Member
STEPHEN CULBERTSON Board Member
JOHN SHORNEY Board Member
STEVEN LANKENAU Board Member
CAROLINE KANE Board Member
ROBERT THOMPSON Board President
STEVEN LANKENAU Board President
KATHLEEN MARSH Board President
SONYA KIM Treasurer
TODD VUNDERINK Secretary
CAROLINE KANE Board Member
DANIEL DORFF Board Member
EUGENE CAPRIOGLIO Board Member
IAN MCLOUGHLIN Board Member
JAMES GRUPENHOFF Board Member
JEFF SCHROEDL Board Member
JOHN SHORNEY Board Member
KATHRYN KNIGHT Board Member
MARCO BERROCAL Board Member
MATTHEW KEISER Board Member
MENDY VARGA Board Member
STEPHEN CULBERTSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 51.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.