Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 62 Stable Stable Watch
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Singleton Board President —
Joseph Peters Treasurer —
Rosalind Levinson Board President —
Ann Amarga Secretary —
Carolyn Pollak Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Singleton Board President —
Joseph Peters Treasurer —
Rosalind Levinson Board President —
Ann Amarga Secretary —
Emily Whildin Board Member —
Carolyn Pollak Board Member —
Alicia Miller Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Singleton Board President —
Sandra Elm Board President —
Joseph Peters Treasurer —
Rosalind Levinson Board President —
Ann Amarga Secretary —
Scott Gerhardt Board Member —
Emily Whildin Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (75 vs. 47).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.