Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag ↓
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 Hidden Hidden — 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 36 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW H HURLOCK Board President —
KATE COLLIS Treasurer —
ANDREW DAVIS Board Member —
JOSEPH FIELD Board Member —
MICHAEL FULLER Board Member —
BENJAMIN HILDNER Board Member —
AMANDA GROVE HOLMEN Board Member —
WILLIAM JACOB III Board Member —
LATIFA KOSTA Board Member —
WILLIAM D LESE Board Member —
SIR SYDNEY LIPWORTH QC Board Member —
LADY LIPWORTH CBE Board Member —
IRENE MAVROYANNIS Board Member —
SAUL NATHAN Board Member —
MRS ROBERT S PITTS JR Board Member —
HONORABLE JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
MRS JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
JAN P VAN ECK Board Member —
DAVID WHELTON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BENJAMIN HILDNER Board Member —
AMANDA GROVE HOLMEN Board Member —
WILLIAM JACOB III Board Member —
LATIFA KOSTA Board Member —
WILLIAM D LESE Board Member —
SIR SYDNEY LIPWORTH QC Board Member —
LADY LIPWORTH CBE Board Member —
IRENE MAVROYANNIS Board Member —
SAUL NATHAN Board Member —
MRS ROBERT S PITTS JR Board Member —
HONORABLE JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
MRS JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
JAN F VAN ECK Board Member —
DAVID WHELTON Board Member —
MATTHEW H HURLOCK Board President —
KATE COLLIS Treasurer —
ANDREW DAVIS Board Member —
JOSEPH FIELD Board Member —
MICHAEL FULLER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW H HURLOCK Board President —
KIM LASSEMILLANTE Treasurer —
ANDREW DAVIS Board Member —
JOSEPH FIELD Board Member —
MICHAEL FULLER Board Member —
BENJAMIN HILDNER Board Member —
AMANDA GROVE HOLMEN Board Member —
WILLIAM JACOB III Board Member —
LATIFA KOSTA Board Member —
WILLIAM D LESE Board Member —
SIR SYDNEY LIPWORTH QC Board Member —
LADY LIPWORTH CBE Board Member —
IRENE MAVROYANNIS Board Member —
SAUL NATHAN Board Member —
MRS ROBERT S PITTS JR Board Member —
HONORABLE JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
MRS JAY T SNYDER Board Member —
JAN F VAN ECK Board Member —
DAVID WHELTON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 124 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 25 points below the peer median (50 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.