Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 22.8% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 9.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 7.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 3.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 5.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 5.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 1.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 4.1% 49 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 4.0% 51 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 4.6% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 3.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE DAVIDSON Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
MARIE-LOUISE STEGALL DIR Development 2.3% of Rev
MICHAEL SOLOMON DIR Administration 1.7% of Rev
ELINOR L HOOVER Board Member
PHYLLIS GRANN Board Member
ROBERT HOGLUND Board President
PETER W KEEGAN Board President
TATIANA POUSCHINE Treasurer
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member
SALLY CLEMENT Board Member
JOSEPH COHEN Board Member
JOYCE COWIN Board Member
LINDA DAINES Board Member
PETER DUCHIN Board Member
JUDY EVNIN Board Member
JENNIFER GARRETT Board Member
WILLIAM GINSBERG Board Member
WALTER HARRIS Board Member
PHILIP HOWARD Board Member
CHRISTOPHER HUGHES Board Member
PRISCILLA KAUFF Treasurer
VICKI KELLOGG Board Member
HELEN LEVINE Board Member
JOHN LINDSEY Board Member
JAMES O'SHAUGHNESSY Board Member
RICHARD PRINS Secretary
SUSAN VAUCHER Board Member
SUSAN WALLACH Board President
ALAN WEILER Board Member
KATHE WILLIAMSON Board Member
DAVID NIEMEC Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Suzanne Davidson Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Marie-Louise Stegal Board Member 2.0% of Rev
Michael Solomon Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Elinor L Hoover Board President
Robert Hoglund Board President
Peter W Keegan Board President
Tatiana Pouschine Treasurer
Paul B Gridley Secretary
Nasrin Abdolai Board Member
Sally Dayton Clement Board Member
Joseph M Cohen Board Member
Joyce B Cowin Board Member
Linda S Daines Board Member
Peter Duchin Board Member
Judy Evnin Board Member
Jennifer PA Garrett Board Member
William B Ginsberg Board Member
Walter L Harris Board Member
Philip K Howard Board Member
Christopher R Hughes Board Member
Priscilla F Kauff Treasurer
Vicki Kellogg Board Member
Helen Brown Levine Board Member
John L Lindsey Board Member
James P O'Shaughnessy Board Member
Richard Prins Board Member
Susan Vaucher Board Member
Susan Wallach Board Member
Alan Weiler Board Member
Kathe Williamson Board Member
Phyllis Grann Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 54 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.