Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 22.8% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 9.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 7.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 3.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 5.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 5.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 1.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 4.1% 49 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 4.0% 51 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 4.6% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 3.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE DAVIDSON Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
MARIE-LOUISE STEGALL DIR Development 2.3% of Rev
MICHAEL SOLOMON DIR Administration 1.7% of Rev
ELINOR L HOOVER Board Member —
PHYLLIS GRANN Board Member —
ROBERT HOGLUND Board President —
PETER W KEEGAN Board President —
TATIANA POUSCHINE Treasurer —
PAUL B GRIDLEY Board Member —
SALLY CLEMENT Board Member —
JOSEPH COHEN Board Member —
JOYCE COWIN Board Member —
LINDA DAINES Board Member —
PETER DUCHIN Board Member —
JUDY EVNIN Board Member —
JENNIFER GARRETT Board Member —
WILLIAM GINSBERG Board Member —
WALTER HARRIS Board Member —
PHILIP HOWARD Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HUGHES Board Member —
PRISCILLA KAUFF Treasurer —
VICKI KELLOGG Board Member —
HELEN LEVINE Board Member —
JOHN LINDSEY Board Member —
JAMES O'SHAUGHNESSY Board Member —
RICHARD PRINS Secretary —
SUSAN VAUCHER Board Member —
SUSAN WALLACH Board President —
ALAN WEILER Board Member —
KATHE WILLIAMSON Board Member —
DAVID NIEMEC Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Suzanne Davidson Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Marie-Louise Stegal Board Member 2.0% of Rev
Michael Solomon Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Elinor L Hoover Board President —
Robert Hoglund Board President —
Peter W Keegan Board President —
Tatiana Pouschine Treasurer —
Paul B Gridley Secretary —
Nasrin Abdolai Board Member —
Sally Dayton Clement Board Member —
Joseph M Cohen Board Member —
Joyce B Cowin Board Member —
Linda S Daines Board Member —
Peter Duchin Board Member —
Judy Evnin Board Member —
Jennifer PA Garrett Board Member —
William B Ginsberg Board Member —
Walter L Harris Board Member —
Philip K Howard Board Member —
Christopher R Hughes Board Member —
Priscilla F Kauff Treasurer —
Vicki Kellogg Board Member —
Helen Brown Levine Board Member —
John L Lindsey Board Member —
James P O'Shaughnessy Board Member —
Richard Prins Board Member —
Susan Vaucher Board Member —
Susan Wallach Board Member —
Alan Weiler Board Member —
Kathe Williamson Board Member —
Phyllis Grann Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 54 → 45 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.