Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 14.0% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 8.2% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 22.2% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 40.3% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 11.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 9.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 6.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 6.3% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 6.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 4.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 5.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 5.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 9.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN F SMITH Executive Director 8.2% of Rev
ANDREA SHACKFORD Treasurer 6.4% of Rev
HAROLD BINGHAM Board President
CONSTANCE KANE Board President
KELLYANN NELSON Secretary
CYNTHIA CROSE Treasurer
CATHERINE PETERSON Board Member
JOSEPH FERST Board Member
ERIN R FREEMAN Board Member
SHOHEI KOBAYASHI Board Member
JESS PERRY Board Member
RICKY DAVIS Board Member
DAVID YAW Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN F SMITH Executive Director 7.9% of Rev
ANDREA SHACKFORD Treasurer 6.1% of Rev
CONSTANCE KANE Board President
JES PERRY Secretary
CYNTHIA CROSE Treasurer
HAROLD BINGHAM Board President
CATHERINE PETERSON Board Member
JOSEPH FERST Board Member
ERIN R FREEMAN Board Member
SHOHEI KOBAYASHI Board Member
KELLYANN NELSON Board Member
RICKY DAVIS Board Member
DAVID YAW Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN F SMITH Board President 7.1% of Rev
ANDREA SHACKFORD Treasurer 5.6% of Rev
HOLLY WOLF Board President
CONSTANCE KANE Board President
JES PERRY Secretary
CYNTHIA CROSE Treasurer
HAROLD BINGHAM Board Member
CATHERINE PETERSON Board Member
JOSEPH FERST Board Member
ERIN R FREEMAN Board Member
DOROTHY PHILLIPS Board Member
J ANDERSON PLUMER Board Member
CAROL ROBBINS Board Member
LINDA TUEL Board Member
DAVID YAW Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA SHACKFORD Treasurer 8.3% of Rev
STEVEN F SMITH Board President 6.7% of Rev
HOLLY WOLF Board President
CONSTANCE KANE Board President
DOROTHY PHILLIPS Secretary
CYNTHIA CROSE Treasurer
HAROLD BINGHAM Board Member
JOSEPH FERST Board Member
ERIN R FREEMAN Board Member
JES PERRY Board Member
J ANDERSON PLUMER Board Member
CAROL ROBBINS Board Member
LINDA TUEL Board Member
ALISON VAREIKA Board Member
DAVID YAW Board Member
CATHERINE PETERSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA SHACKFORD Treasurer 5.7% of Rev
STEVEN F SMITH Board President 2.8% of Rev
DEBRALEE KENNEDY Executive Director 1.5% of Rev
PETER SARGENT Board President
HOLLY WOLFF Board President
DOROTHY PHILLIPS Secretary
CYNTHIA CROSE Treasurer
CONSTANCE KANE Board Member
JOSEPH FERST Board Member
ERIN R FREEMAN Board Member
JES PERRY Board Member
J ANDERSON PLUMER Board Member
CAROL ROBBINS Board Member
LINDA TUEL Board Member
ALISON VAREIKA Board Member
DAVID YAW Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.