Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 18.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 12.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 14.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 7.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 10.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 15.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 18.2% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 11.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 8.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 11.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 9.4% of Rev
ASHLEY DIGIORGI MANAGING PRO 8.6% of Rev
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer —
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer —
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary —
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member —
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President —
SUSIE GOULD Board Member —
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member —
MARSHA MASON Board Member —
NISHA SHETH Board Member —
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member —
JASON TAM Board Member —
CHRIS YEGEN CHAIRMAN —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman —
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President —
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer —
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer —
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary —
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member —
MARSHA MASON Board Member —
NISHA SHETH Treasurer —
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member —
CHARLIE MacLEOD Board Member —
SUSIE GOULD Board Member —
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member —
JASON TAM Board President —
AMYT ECKSTEIN Board Member —
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 7.2% of Rev
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman —
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President —
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer —
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer —
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary —
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member —
MARSHA MASON Board Member —
NISHA SHETH Board Member —
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member —
DAVID F WERTHEIMER Board Member —
EMMY ZUCKERMAN Board Member —
CHISA HUTCHINSON Board Member —
JASON TAM Board Member —
EMILY WEXLER Board Member —
SHARON TZUANG Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN SILVERSTEIN Artistic Director 6.8% of Rev
CHRIS YEGEN Chairman —
LINDA D'ONOFRIO Board President —
GEORGE BEAN Treasurer —
BILL BRADFORD Treasurer —
ELIZABETH CORRADINO Secretary —
ROSE COURTNEY Board Member —
MARSHA MASON Board Member —
NISHA SHETH Board Member —
PATRICIA STOCKHAUSEN Board Member —
DAVID F WERTHEIMER Board Member —
EMMY ZUCKERMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.