Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
25
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 14.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 8.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 8.4% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 27.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 14.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2019 7.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 7.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 7.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 8.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 8.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 7.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 6.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HSIU JUNG CHEN Executive Director 5.7% of Rev
HSINYI HUANG Board Member 5.5% of Rev
CHUNG-YUAN LIN Board Member 1.8% of Rev
ChunSheng Chang Exec.Dir.&Secry 1.1% of Rev
MARGARET VEE Board Member
CELIA LIANG Treasurer
RICHARD LIN Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HSIU JUNG CHEN Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
HSINYI HUANG Board Member 3.9% of Rev
ChunSheng Chang Exec.Dir.&Secry 2.8% of Rev
MARGARET VEE Board Member
CELIA LIANG Treasurer
HSI-CHIA HSIEH Board Member
RICHARD LIN Secretary
HSINYI HUANG Board Member
HSIU JUNG CHEN Executive Director
MARGARET VEE Board Member
CELIA LIANG Treasurer
HSI-CHIA HSIEH Board Member
RICHARD LIN Secretary
ChunSheng Chang Exec.Dir.&Secry

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HSIU JUNG CHEN Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
HSINYI HUANG Board Member 3.4% of Rev
ChunSheng Chang Exec.Dir.&Secry 3.0% of Rev
MARGARET VEE Board Member
CELIA LIANG Treasurer
HSI-CHIA HSIEH Board Member
RICHARD LIN Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.