Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
38
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 19.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 30.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 90.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 10.5% 39 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Judith Jarosz Board Member 9.9% of Rev
David B Fuller Treasurer 9.7% of Rev
Abigail Dennis Board Member —
Charlie Berigan Board Member —
Susan Broadwin Board Member —
Mark Gamell Board Member —
John Johmann Board Member —
David Scott Macy Board Member —
Lynn Marie Macy Board President —
Todd Schwarz Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David B Fuller Treasurer 14.9% of Rev
Judith Jarosz Board Member 14.9% of Rev
Abigail Dennis Board Member —
Charlie Berigan Board Member —
Susan Broadwin Board Member —
Mark Gamell Board Member —
John Johmann Board Member —
David Scott Macy Board Member —
Lynn Marie Macy Board President —
Todd Schwarz Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David B Fuller Treasurer 12.8% of Rev
Judith Jarosz Board Member 12.1% of Rev
Abigail Dennis Board Member —
Charlie Berigan Board Member —
Susan Broadwin Board Member —
Mark Gamell Board Member —
John Johmann Board Member —
David Scott Macy Board Member —
Lynn Marie Macy Board President —
Todd Schwarz Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David B Fuller Treasurer 4.9% of Rev
Judith Jarosz Board Member 4.9% of Rev
Abigail Dennis Board Member —
Robert Armstrong Martin Board Member —
Charlie Berigan Board Member —
Susan Broadwin Board Member —
Mark Gamell Board Member —
John Johmann Board Member —
David Scott Macy Board Member —
Lynn Marie Macy Board President —
Todd Schwarz Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 142 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 34 points below the peer median (45 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.