Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 14.9% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Valentini D Papadakos Board Member 15.4% of Rev
Dimitri P Papadakos Board President —
Susan Tuccillio Board Member —
Ted Kastrinos Board Member —
Lesli Lyon Theobald Board Member —
Joanne Beckman-Hertzman Board Member —
Michael Grundfast Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 15 points below the peer median (50 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.