Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 19.1% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 0.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 6.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 3.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sekou Branch Executive Director 14.4% of Rev
Vernon Williams 4.7% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sekou Saiku Branch Executive Director 11.5% of Rev
Vernon William Board Member 5.8% of Rev
Sekou Branch Executive Director
Vernon Williams Board Member
Ivan Kazembe Rogers Board President
Apani Smith Treasurer
James J Williams Board Member
Sonia Diaz Secretary
Greg Barnch Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points above the peer median (50 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.