Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 14.6% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 11.4% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 12.8% 56 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.9% 52 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 11.0% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 1.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 9.3% 48 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 10.8% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 8.8% 52 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 18.8% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 12.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH ABRUZZI Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
JOSHUA RUFF Executive Director 5.3% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 3.3% of Rev
THOMAS M SULLIVAN CHAIRMAN —
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary —
THERESA KELLY Treasurer —
SANDI BREWSTER-WALKER Board Member —
MICHAEL A BUTLER Board Member —
MARK M CHAMBERS PHD Board Member —
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member —
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member —
RON HOFFMAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member —
MICHAEL PERCENT Board Member —
DOUGLAS REINA Board Member —
SCOTT SANDERS Board Member —
KRISTEN SIMMONS Board Member —
SUE KIESEL WAGNER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
SARAH ABRUZZI Board Member 4.2% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 3.1% of Rev
THOMAS M SULLIVAN CHAIRMAN —
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary —
THERESA KELLY Treasurer —
ELIZABETH M ATWOOD Board Member —
DAVID M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member —
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member —
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member —
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member —
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member —
MARK M CHAMBERS PHD Board Member —
RON HOFFMAN Board Member —
DOUGLAS REINA Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
KAREN LAVERY Treasurer 3.2% of Rev
LAURIE CURIALE Treasurer 1.2% of Rev
LINDA U MARGOLIN ESQ Board President —
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary —
THOMAS M SULLIVAN Treasurer —
DANIEL M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member —
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member —
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member —
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member —
MICHAEL P LOCORRIERE Board Member —
FILOMENA LOMBARDI Board Member —
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH ATWOOD Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NEIL WATSON Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
KAREN LAVERY Treasurer 3.7% of Rev
LINDA U MARGOLIN ESQ Board President —
BARBARA H GOTTFRIED Secretary —
JAMES J CARPENTER Treasurer —
DANIEL M BAGATTA ESQ Board Member —
PETER A FERENTINOS Board Member —
RAFFAELA FERRO Board Member —
AARON W GODFREY Board Member —
CATHLEEN HANSEN Board Member —
MICHAEL P LOCORRIERE Board Member —
FILOMENA LOMBARDI Board Member —
THOMAS M SULLIVAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH KAHN KAPLAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH ATWOOD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 281 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 30 points below the peer median (50 vs. 80).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.