Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW KRUMHOLTZ Board President
RICK SADLON Board President
ANNE DRANGINIS Board President
THOMAS C CLARK Board President
CAROLINE MESSENGER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MARTHA BERNSTEIN BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANDREW TAYLOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MICHAEL ACCUOSTI Treasurer
DR MICHAEL FEINBERG Secretary
DON FIFTAL Board President
ISOBEL MOORE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NANCY KIELY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGINA KRAUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR JAMES CHITTUM Board President
KENNETH BLAZIER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MATTHEW KRUMHOLTZ BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAUL KELLY MD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MSGR ROBERT TUCKER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICK SADLON BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANNE DRANGINIS Secretary
JAMES FLINT MD Board President
CAROLINE MESSENGER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DR JAMES CHITTUM Board President
THOMAS C CLARK Board President
KENNETH BLAZIER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DR EMILY EISEN BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MATTHEW KRUMHOLTZ BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALBERT MACCHIONI BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAUL KELLY MD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JOYCE S SCHWARTZ BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MSGR ROBERT TUCKER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KEVIN TAYLOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICK SADLON BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NANCY KIELY Treasurer
ANNE DRANGINIS Secretary
DR MICHAEL FEINBERG BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JAMES FLINT MD Board President
JUDITH MILLER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CAROLINE MESSENGER Board President
ISOBEL MOORE Board President
THOMAS C CLARK Board President
KIM WELCH Board President
DR EMILY EISEN Board President
DON FIFTAL Board President
ALBERT MACCHIONI BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JOYCE S SCHWARTZ Board President
KEVIN TAYLOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NANCY KIELY Treasurer
DR MICHAEL FEINBERG BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JUDITH MILLER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ISOBEL MOORE Board President
KIM WELCH Board President
DON FIFTAL Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR JAMES CHITTUM Board President
KENNETH BLAZIER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MARCY MEJIA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAUL KELLY MD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
LAURA CONWAY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MSGR ROBERT TUCKER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICK SADLON BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANNE DRANGINIS Secretary
PHIL STERLING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JAMES FLINT MD Board President
CAROLINE MESSENGER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THOMAS C CLARK Board President
DR EMILY EISEN BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ALBERT MACCHIONI BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JOYCE S SCHWARTZ BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KEVIN TAYLOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
NANCY KIELY Treasurer
DR MICHAEL FEINBERG BOARD OF DIRECTORS
JUDITH MILLER BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ISOBEL MOORE Board President
PATRICK CONWAY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
KIM WELCH Board President
DON FIFTAL Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 130 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.