Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 22.5% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 — — 16.1% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 18.5% 41 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 19.9% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 15.4% 35 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 19.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 14.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 14.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 18.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 16.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 13.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 14.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 11.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 6.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sandra Nikolajevs Artistic Director Hidden
Nelson Hicks Board Chairman —
Angela Estes Secretary —
Pamela Pollitt Treasurer —
Barbara Campbell Board Member —
Jeff Foster Board Member —
Sally Lovejoy Board Member —
Susan Parsons Board Member —
Rajan Govindan Board Member —
Tom Lindstrom Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sandra Nikolajevs Artistic Director Hidden
Robert Polack Chairman —
Katherine Roberts Board Member —
Charles Tremann Treasurer —
Griff Hogan Past Chairman —
Rosa Fullerton Board Member —
Rick Wilson Board Member —
Barbara Campbell Board Member —
Joe Lambright Board Member —
Susan Parsons Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sandra Nikolajevs Artistic Director Hidden
Sandra Nikolajevs Artistic Director Hidden
Griff Hogan Board Member —
Charles Tremann Treasurer —
Robert Polack Board Chairman —
Katherine Roberts Board Member —
Joe Lambright Board Member —
Nelson Hicks Board Member —
Sally Lovejoy Board Member —
Susan Lobell Board Member —
Griff Hogan Board President —
Nelson Hicks Treasurer —
Charles Tremann Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 129 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points below the peer median (25 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.