Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 39 | Financially Distressed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEvin Peters | Board President | — | ||
| Joseph Ferlo | Board Member | — | ||
| Carey Rayburn | Board Member | — | ||
| Karen Kennedy | Board President | — | ||
| Spring Karlo | Board President | — | ||
| Luisa Kormann | Board President | — | ||
| Ananda Bena Weber | Secretary | — | ||
| Josh Benson | Treasurer | — | ||
| Lisa Conlon | Board Member | — | ||
| Erika Finley | Board Member | — | ||
| Phyllis Rush | Board Member | — | ||
| Jacob Deaton | Board Member | — | ||
| Erin Miller | Board Member | — | ||
| Tara Bailey | Board Member | — | ||
| Micah Christian | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 56 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A0.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (15 vs. 41).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.