Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM CORCORAN Artistic Director
DAVID MOGENTALE Artistic Director
LEO FARLEY Board Member
PAULA EWIN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM CORCORAN Artistic Director
DAVID MOGENTALE Artistic Director
LEO FARLEY Board Member
PAULA EWIN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM CORCORAN Artistic Director
DAVID MOGENTALE Artistic Director
LEO FARLEY Board Member
PAULA EWIN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 37 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.