Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 Hidden Hidden 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARYANN BURNS Board Member
DAVID NASPO Board Member
MATTHEW UDAL Board Member
JEFFREY MYSHRALL Treasurer
LUCIEN RUCCI Board President
SUSAN RYDER Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRENDAN BLISS Board Member
CARMINE FORTINO Board Member
LUCIEN RUCCI Board Member
AYLAH CLARK Board Member
TOM JOHNSTON Board Member
JEFFREY MYSHRALL Treasurer
RAYMOND BLISS Board President
SUSAN RYDER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 131 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points below the peer median (20 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.