Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 29.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 30.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 48.7% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 34.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 20.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 29.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29.5% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 13.9% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 25.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 19.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 16.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 1.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas C Crawford Artistic Director Hidden
David Larkin Executive Director Hidden
Gerald Rizzieri Board Member
Darlene Pasquill Board Member
Debra J Toppeta Board President
Lauri Baker Board President
William T Potvin Treasurer
Peter R Burnim Board Member
Rob Hahn Board Member
Andrew L Cheskis Board Member
William Lee Board Member
John Goodman Board Member
Cynthia C Wainwrig Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas C Crawford Artistic Director Hidden
David Larkin Executive Dir. Hidden
Debra J Toppeta Board President
Lauri Baker Board President
William T Potvin Treasurer
Liz Taxin Nemiroff Secretary
Peter R Burnim Board Member
Rob Hahn Board Member
William Lee Board Member
Andrew L Cheskis Board Member
James Shackelford Board Member
RJ Bucaria Board Member
Nicholas IW Horsburgh Board Member
Cynthia C Wainwrig Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas C Crawford Artistic Director Hidden
David Larkin Executive Dir. Hidden
Amanda Sidebottom Dir. Of Ops/Fin Hidden
Debra J Toppeta Board President
Liz Taxin Nemiroff Secretary
William T Potvin Treasurer
RJ Bucaria Board Member
Peter R Burnim Board Member
Rob Hahn Board Member
William Lee Board Member
Kevin King Board Member
Andrew L Cheskis Board Member
James Shackelford Board Member
Lauri Baker Board Member
Nicholas IW Horsburgh Board Member
Cynthia C Wainwrig Board Member
Steven Schwimmer Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas C Crawford Artistic Director Hidden
David Larkin Executive Dir. Hidden
Amanda Sidebottom eff 120 Dir. Of Ops/Fin Hidden
Andrew L Cheskis Board President
Debra J Toppeta Board President
Matthew D Kaplan Treasurer
Philip Butterfield thru 420 Board Member
Peter R Burnim Board Member
Rob Hahn Board Member
William Lee Board Member
Kevin King Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~15 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.