Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA ZAHANSKY Board President —
LEAH SCHAD Board President —
KAREN DELUCA Treasurer —
MARY ARCHAMBAULT Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDSAY PAUL Board President —
THOMAS DOHERTY Board President —
KAREN DELUCA Treasurer —
MARY ARCHAMBAULT Secretary —
MELISSA ZAHANSKY Board President —
LEAH SCHAD Board President —
KAREN DELUCA Treasurer —
MARY ARCHAMBAULT Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points below the peer median (15 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.