Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2023 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 13.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 14.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Treasurer —
LOUIS BROUDY Board President —
LIBBY MUCCI Board Member —
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member —
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member —
VANESSA MOREST SMITH Board Member —
MARY PETRO NOONAN VICE PRESDENT —
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member —
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member —
Gunnar Sahlin Board Member —
Jennifer Mirsky Board Member —
Priscilla Woyke Board Member —
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member —
douglas adams PRESDENT —
charles johnson Board Member —
Wendy Gerbier Board Member —
Douglas Kerridge Board Member —
Peter Hohmeister Board Member —
JOHN BRADY III Board Member —
KENNETH KUO Board Member —
HEATHER DRUGGE Board Member —
PASQUALE RAZZANO Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Board President —
LOUIS BROUDY Board President —
LIBBY MUCCI Secretary —
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member —
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member —
VANESSA MOREST Board Member —
MARY PETRO NOONAN Board Member —
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member —
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member —
ERIC FREEMAN Treasurer —
Jennifer Mirsky Board Member —
CAROLE MAXWELL Board Member —
EVA TOFT Board Member —
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member —
douglas adams Board Member —
charles johnson Board President —
Wendy Gerbier Board Member —
Douglas Kerridge Board Member —
Peter Hohmeister Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BELL Board President —
LOUIS BROUDY Board President —
LIBBY MUCCI Secretary —
RICHARD BEYMAN Board Member —
LAWRENCE CAVANAGH Board Member —
VANESSA MOREST Board Member —
MARY PETRO NOONAN Board Member —
GREGORY PAYNE Board Member —
WALLACE DAVIS Board Member —
ERIC FREEMAN Treasurer —
WARREN SHAPIRO Board Member —
CAROLE MAXWELL Board Member —
EVA TOFT Board Member —
GEORGIA VON SCHMIDT Board Member —
douglas adams Board Member —
charles johnson Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 46 points below the peer median (5 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.