Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 47 Fragile Recovery
2023 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN MILLER Board President
GERRY ALLEN Board President
JAMIE RICHARDS Treasurer
TIMOTHY WELLS Secretary
LEE NEW III Board Member
TOM MC PHERSON Board Member
MARTY POSNER Board Member
MICHAEL BOND IV Board Member
FREDERICK FOSTER Board Member
EDWIN MARTINEZ Board Member
EDUARDO OJEDA Board Member
GEO PASSMORE Board Member
RANDEE STEWART Board Member
JIM VILLETA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN DUFF Board Member Hidden
PATRICK BERNARD RUSSELL Board President
JAMES KOPERSKI Board President
MARCOS CHALJUB-ZAMBRANO Treasurer
AARON VALENTINE Treasurer
STEPHEN SUMMERS Secretary
MICHAEL UNGER Board Member
RYAN MILLER Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points above the peer median (55 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.