Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN MILLER Board President —
GERRY ALLEN Board President —
JAMIE RICHARDS Treasurer —
TIMOTHY WELLS Secretary —
LEE NEW III Board Member —
TOM MC PHERSON Board Member —
MARTY POSNER Board Member —
MICHAEL BOND IV Board Member —
FREDERICK FOSTER Board Member —
EDWIN MARTINEZ Board Member —
EDUARDO OJEDA Board Member —
GEO PASSMORE Board Member —
RANDEE STEWART Board Member —
JIM VILLETA Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN DUFF Board Member Hidden
PATRICK BERNARD RUSSELL Board President —
JAMES KOPERSKI Board President —
MARCOS CHALJUB-ZAMBRANO Treasurer —
AARON VALENTINE Treasurer —
STEPHEN SUMMERS Secretary —
MICHAEL UNGER Board Member —
RYAN MILLER Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 43 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 13 points below the peer median (50 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.