Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
21
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EVA MARIE PACHECO Board Member
SARA BARNEY LUSTIG Board President
KATRINA CLIDENCE Treasurer
ROBERT FERLAND Board President
PHILIP GORDON Secretary
KIMBERLY IZZI Board Member
JUSTIN GHARAVI Board Member
EVA MARIE PACHECO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA LUSTIG Secretary Hidden
GARY LEVEILLEE Board President
EVA MARIE PACHECO VICE PRESIDE
JOHN CILLINO Treasurer
ROBERT FERLAND Board Member
ADAM RAMSEY Board Member
LAURINE RYAN PERRY Board Member
KIMBERLY IZZI Board Member
MARIE RINAUDO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH THOMAS Treasurer
GARY LEVEILLEE Board President
EVA MARIE PACHECO BARNEY VICE PRESIDE
SARA LUSTIG Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in RI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (5 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.