Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elizabeth Etter Executive Director Hidden
Natalie Zhu Artistic Director Hidden
Shaughn Robinson Board President —
Devendra Kale Treasurer —
Patricia Moore Secretary —
Winifred Brownell Board President —
Vera Wilsin Board Member —
Bjorn Wellenius Board Member —
Bonnie Slobodien Board Member —
Maureen Moakely Board Member —
Gary Brownell Board Member —
Mark Conley Board Member —
Theodore Wachs Board Member —
Martin Maleska Board Member —
Lawrence Grebstein Board Member —
Valerie Cooksen Botto Executive Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH MARCOTTE Executive Director Hidden
NATALIE ZHU Artistic Director Hidden
GIGI EDWARDS Treasurer —
LAWRENCE GREBSTEIN Board Member —
STEPHEN ERICKSON Board Member —
HEATHER JOHNSON Board Member —
JOSE AMADOR Board Member —
VERA WILSON Board Member —
SUSAN MARCUS Board Member —
MARK CONLEY Board Member —
EMILY CHEN Board Member —
WINIFRED BROWNELL Board Member —
DEBORAH GROSSMAN-GARBER Board President —
PATRICIA MOORE Secretary —
SHAUGHN ROBINSON Board President —
EVE SADD Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIE ZHU Artistic Director Hidden
BINGXUAN LIN Treasurer —
VICTOR MAIN Board Member —
STEPHEN ERICKSON Board Member —
LAWRENCE GREBSTEIN Board Member —
JOSE AMADOR Board Member —
GIGI EDWARDS Board Member —
SUSAN MARCUS Board Member —
VERA WILSON Board Member —
EMILY CHEN Board Member —
MARK CONLEY Board Member —
ELIZABETH MARCOTTE Board Member —
WINIFRED BROWNELL Board Member —
SHAUGHN ROBINSON Board President —
PATRICIA MOORE Secretary —
DEBORAH GROSSMAN-GARBER Board President —
EVE SADD Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NATALIE ZHU Artistic Director Hidden
PATRICIA MOORE Secretary —
STEPHEN ERICKSON Board Member —
LAWRENCE GREBSTEIN Board Member —
BINGXUAN LIN Treasurer —
VICTOR MAIN Board Member —
BARBARA MARICONDA Board Member —
SUSAN MARCUS Board Member —
VERA WILSON Board Member —
ELIZABETH MARCOTTE Board President —
WINIFRED BROWNELL Board Member —
EMILY CHEN Board Member —
MARK CONLEY Board Member —
DEBORAH GROSSMAN-GARBER Board Member —
ANGELO MENDILLO III Board Member —
EVE SADD Board Member —
SHAUGHN ROBINSON Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in RI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (40 vs. 68).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.