Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY ANN LEDBETTER Board President
NARDA SNELL Treasurer
SUZANNE ROSEVEAR Board President
WENDY THIBAULT Secretary
SUSAN BODINGTON Board Member
JOANNE SOUZA Board Member
SIMONE PASQUARILLO Board Member
GAYLE RAPOSA Board Member
KATHY CROWELEY-GARDNER Board Member
DONNA GRACE Board Member
KRISTEN CRONIN Board Member
KEVIN MURPHY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE ROSEVEAR Board President
NARDA SNELL Treasurer
SALLY ANN LEDBETTER Board President
WENDY THIBAULT Secretary
SUSAN BODINGTON Board Member
JOANNE SOUZA Board Member
SIMONE PASQUARILLO Board Member
GAYLE RAPOSA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points above the peer median (90 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.