Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 2.5% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 4.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 5.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 6.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 9.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE MAGUIRE Artistic Director Hidden
KATHLEEN MAGUIRE Artistic Director Hidden
ALLISON RACHELE BAYLES EDUCATION DI Hidden
DAVID AUERBACH VICE-PRESIDE
MEL BARKAN Board Member
ALAN BASSMAN Board Member
ROBERT BECKER Board Member
MADELAINE BERG Board Member
ROBERT BERZOK Secretary
BRUCE BIRENBOIM VICE PRESIDE
WENDE CARVER VICE PRESIDE
KATHLEEN FABRIZIO Board Member
THOMAS FYNAN Board Member
DR LESLIE BORCK JAMESON Board Member
DAVID LLOYD JR Vice President
MARVIN KRISLOV Board Member
BRIAN MARSHALL Board Member
GERRY MCINTYRE Board Member
TARA WILSON NOTH Board Member
LEE PERLMAN Board President
DANIEL PROSKIN Board Member
LORI A ROBBINS Board Member
LINDA RUBERTO VICE PRESIDE
MARY CAROL RUDIN VICE PRESIDE
LIZ ZIEMINSKI ASSISTANT TR
DAVID AUERBACH VICE-PRESIDE
MEL BARKAN Board Member
ALAN BASSMAN Board Member
ALLISON RACHELE BAYLES Board Member
ROBERT BECKER Board Member
MADELAINE BERG Board Member
ROBERT BERZOK Secretary
BRUCE BIRENBOIM VICE PRESIDE
WENDE CARVER VICE PRESIDE
KATHLEEN FABRIZIO Board Member
THOMAS FYNAN Board Member
DR LESLIE BORCK JAMESON Board Member
DAVID LLOYD JR Vice President
MARVIN KRISLOV Board Member
BRIAN MARSHALL Board Member
GERRY MCINTYRE Board Member
TARA WILSON NOTH Board Member
LEE PERLMAN Board President
DANIEL PROSKIN Board Member
LORI A ROBBINS Board Member
JAMES RUBERTO HONORARY CHA
LINDA RUBERTO VICE PRESIDE
MARY CAROL RUDIN VICE PRESIDE
LIZ ZIEMINSKI ASSISTANT TR

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATE MAGUIRE Artistic Director Hidden
DAVID AUBERBACH VICE-PRESIDE
ROBERT BECKER Board Member
ROBERT BERZOK Secretary
BRUCE BIRENBOIM VICE PRESIDE
RUTH BLODGETT Board President
WENDE CARVER Board Member
DAVID COMALLI VICE PRESIDE
KATHLEEN FABRIZIO Board Member
MARIE FEDER Board Member
ALAN FILDERMAN Board Member
DAVID LLOYD JR Vice President
SCOTT KIRCHNER Board Member
GERRY MCINTYRE Board Member
ANDREW MICK Board Member
LEE PERLMAN Board President
LORI A ROBBINS Board Member
CASEY MEADE ROTHSTEIN-FITZPATRICK Board Member
LINDA RUBERTO Board Member
MARY CAROL RUDIN Board Member
ALLI SHEEHAN VICE PRESIDE
KENNETH STARK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.