Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 49 Fragile Recovery
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julia McGuirk Board President
Andrew Murachver Treasurer
Greg Gordon Board Member
Amy Lampert Board Member
Lauren Landry Board Member
Marc Pasciucco Board Member
Nicole Wendl Board Member
Lauren Landry Board Member
Jacob Slater Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julia McGuirk Board President
Andrew Murachver Treasurer
Kristi Faby Board Member
Greg Gordon Board Member
Amy Lampert Board Member
Lauren Landry Board Member
Carol Louik Board Member
Marc Pasciucco Board Member
Nicole Wendl Board Member
Julia McGuirk Board President
Andrew Murachver Treasurer
Kristi Faby Board Member
Greg Gordon Board Member
Amy Lampert Board Member
Lauren Landry Board Member
Carol Louik Board Member
Marc Pasciucco Board Member
Nicole Wendl Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (70 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.