Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paul Wright Board President
Joseph Gibson Board President
Jennifer Long Treasurer
Laura Lloyd Secretary
Hannah Younkins Secretary
Cortney Bavara Board Member
Tammy Grantz Board Member
Karissa Lloyd Board Member
Gloria Carney Board Member
Cathy Lippert Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cortney Bavera Board President
Tammy Grantz Board President
Karissa Lloyd Treasurer
Gloria Carney Secretary
Cathy Lippert Secretary
Paul Wright Board Member
Joe Gibson Board Member
Jennifer Long Board Member
Laura Lloyd Board Member
Marj Thomas Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points above the peer median (75 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.