Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 57 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 57 Fragile Recovery
2014 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 61 Stable Decline Risk
2012 65 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Raj Puranik Board President
Alice Phalen Board President
Jeff Long Treasurer
Mike Harde Board Member
Ron Gagnon Board Member
Carol Wing Secretary
Mark Abare Board Member
Heidi Hatke Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Fletcher Board Member Hidden
Raj Puranik Board President
Alice Phalen Board President
Raj Puranik Treasurer
Mike Harde Board Member
Tom Briere Board Member
Marcia Macres Board Member
Mark Abare Board Member
Nick Pangaro Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Raj Puranik Board President
Alice Phalen Board President
Dudley M Harde Treasurer
Jessica Sloan Board Member
Rick Posch Board Member
Sarah Fletcher Board Member
Marcia Macres Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 54 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points above the peer median (90 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.