Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELSEY MCDONOUGH Board President —
KATHLEEN CAMPBELL Treasurer —
DAVID SHEPPARD EXECUTIVE DI —
GAIL BISHOP NESSMAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH PEET Board Member —
THOMAS BERRY Board Member —
CATHY KOERWER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELSEY MCDONOUGH Board President —
KATHLEEN CAMPBELL Treasurer —
DAVID SHEPPARD EXECUTIVE DI —
ERICA GODDARD Board Member —
GAIL BISHOP NESSMAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH PEET Board Member —
THOMAS BERRY Board Member —
CATHY KOERWER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELSEY MCDONOUGH Board President —
KATHLEEN CAMPBELL Treasurer —
THOMAS BERRY Board Member —
CATHERINE KOERWER Board Member —
ELIZABETH PEET Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points above the peer median (80 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.