Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | — | — | 26 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 26 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 26 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | 36.8% | 46 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID AUBERBACH | VICE-PRESIDE | — | ||
| ROBERT BERZOK | Secretary | — | ||
| BRUCE BIRENBOIM | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| RUTH BLODGETT | Board President | — | ||
| WENDE CARVER | Board Member | — | ||
| BARBARA COHEN-HOBBS | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVID COMALLI | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| KATHLEEN FABRIZIO | Board Member | — | ||
| MARIE FEDER | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVID LLOYD JR | Vice President | — | ||
| SCOTT KIRCHNER | Board Member | — | ||
| KATE MAGUIRE | Artistic Director | — | ||
| ANDREW MICK | Board Member | — | ||
| LEE PERLMAN | Vice President | — | ||
| IAN RASCH | Board Member | — | ||
| LORI A ROBBINS | Board Member | — | ||
| CASY MEADE ROTHSTEIN-FITZPATRICK | Board Member | — | ||
| JAMES RUBERTO | HONORARY CHA | — | ||
| LINDA RUBERTO | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| MARY CAROL RUDIN | Board Member | — | ||
| ALLI SHEEHAN | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| KENNETH STARK | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points below the peer median (0 vs. 29).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 52 → 26 over 5 years (declining by 26 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.