Acute Resource Divergence
What does this mean?
Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.
The Path Forward
The Realignment
Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | — | — | 12.9% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 42 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | 3.6% | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | 9.9% | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | 36.5% | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | 59.4% | 38 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.
Overall score has gone from 28 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 12.9% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.