Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President —
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary —
MOLLY RIORDAN Treasurer —
JENIFER LOVELY Board President —
TERI A KINDER Secretary —
PAN TEN EYCK Board Member —
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member —
ROSEMARY FLETCHER Board Member —
ROBYN WATERS Board Member —
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member —
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member —
KARL PELLETIER Board Member —
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member —
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President —
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary —
MOLLY RIORDAN Treasurer —
JENIFER LOVELY Board President —
TERI A KINDER Secretary —
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member —
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member —
ROSEMARY FLETCHER Board Member —
ROBYN WATERS Board Member —
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member —
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member —
KARL PELLETIER Board Member —
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member —
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President —
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary —
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer —
JENIFER LOVELY Board President —
TERI A KINDER Secretary —
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member —
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member —
ANNE SWARCE Board Member —
ROBYN WATERS Board Member —
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member —
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member —
KYLE TOTARO Board Member —
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member —
KARL PELLETIER Board Member —
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member —
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member —
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member —
TERI A KINDER Board Member —
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member —
KARL PELLETIER Board Member —
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President —
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary —
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer —
JENIFER LOVELY Board President —
KYLE TOTARO Board Member —
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member —
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member —
ANNE SWARCE Board Member —
ROBYN WATERS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President —
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary —
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer —
JENIFER LOVELY Board President —
KYLE TOTARO Board Member —
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member —
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member —
ANNE SWARCE Board Member —
ROBYN WATERS Board Member —
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member —
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member —
TERI A KINDER Board Member —
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member —
KARL PELLETIER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.