Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary
MOLLY RIORDAN Treasurer
JENIFER LOVELY Board President
TERI A KINDER Secretary
PAN TEN EYCK Board Member
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member
ROSEMARY FLETCHER Board Member
ROBYN WATERS Board Member
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member
KARL PELLETIER Board Member
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary
MOLLY RIORDAN Treasurer
JENIFER LOVELY Board President
TERI A KINDER Secretary
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member
ROSEMARY FLETCHER Board Member
ROBYN WATERS Board Member
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member
KARL PELLETIER Board Member
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer
JENIFER LOVELY Board President
TERI A KINDER Secretary
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member
ANNE SWARCE Board Member
ROBYN WATERS Board Member
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member
KYLE TOTARO Board Member
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member
KARL PELLETIER Board Member
BRAD BARNSLEY Board Member
LAURA CASSIANI Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member
TERI A KINDER Board Member
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member
KARL PELLETIER Board Member
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer
JENIFER LOVELY Board President
KYLE TOTARO Board Member
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member
ANNE SWARCE Board Member
ROBYN WATERS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA E DeFILIPPO Board President
CAITLIN KOMM Secretary
MARIE RAWSON Treasurer
JENIFER LOVELY Board President
KYLE TOTARO Board Member
CHRISTINE COMEAU Board Member
JESSICA L HAMEL Board Member
ANNE SWARCE Board Member
ROBYN WATERS Board Member
WAYNE ARSENAULT Board Member
LAURIE GAGNE Board Member
TERI A KINDER Board Member
ALLYSON TOTARO Board Member
KARL PELLETIER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.