Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Vladimir Zeleny Board President
Cheryl E Jones Treasurer
Kat Toomey Secretary
Robert Forman Board Member
Brittany Gardner Board Member
Brooke Redpath Board Member
Livingston VandeWater Board Member
Lita Lia Board Member
Kazia Miller Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jack Brown Artistic Director Hidden
Joe Rose Accompanist Hidden
Vladimir Zeleny Board President
Cheryl E Jones Treasurer
Kathleen Toomey Secretary
Lis Wheeler Board Member
Brooke Redpath Board Member
Alana Chernila Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.