Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 3.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 3.4% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 6.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 4.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 3.4% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 4.5% 51 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 5.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 3.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 3.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 2.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 5.3% 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRADLEY VERNATTER Executive Director Hidden
MICHAEL J PUZO Board President
MIGUEL DE BRAGANCA Board President
SUSAN W JACOBS Treasurer
DR IRVING H PLOTKIN Secretary
WAYNE DAVIS Board Member
WILLA BODMAN Board Member
LINDA CABOT BLACK Board Member
ALICIA COONEY Board Member
ALAN DYNNER Board Member
ANDREW EISENBERG Board Member
MIMI HEWLETT Board Member
AMELIA WELT KATZEN Board Member
MARIA J KROKIDAS Board Member
CATHERINE BASSICK Board Member
ABIGAIL B MASON Board Member
A NEIL PAPPALARDO Board Member
E LEE PERRY Board Member
WILLIAM POUNDS Board Member
DAVID W SCUDDER Board Member
RAY STATA Board Member
ROBERT EASTMAN Board Member
ANNE M MORGAN Board Member
TIMOTHY FULHAM Board Member
VINCENT ROUGEAU Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ESTHER NELSON Artistic Director Hidden
KAREN FROST CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (UNTIL 6/21) Hidden
BRADLEY VERNATTER Artistic Director Hidden
MICHAEL J PUZO Board President
MIGUEL DE BRAGANCA Board President
SUSAN W JACOBS Treasurer
DR IRVING H PLOTKIN Secretary
WAYNE DAVIS Board Member
WILLA BODMAN Board Member
LINDA CABOT BLACK Board Member
ALICIA COONEY Board Member
ALAN DYNNER Board Member
ANDREW EISENBERG Board Member
MIMI HEWLETT Board Member
AMELIA WELT KATZEN Board Member
MARIA J KROKIDAS Board Member
JEFFREY MARSHALL Board Member
ABIGAIL B MASON Board Member
A NEIL PAPPALARDO Board Member
E LEE PERRY Board Member
WILLIAM POUNDS Board Member
DAVID W SCUDDER Board Member
RAY STATA Board Member
ROBERT EASTMAN Board Member
ANNE M MORGAN Board Member
TIMOTHY FULHAM Board Member
VINCENT ROUGEAU Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ESTHER NELSON Artistic Director Hidden
EILEEN WILLISTON Board Member Hidden
KAREN FROST CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Hidden
MICHAEL J PUZO Board President
MIGUEL DE BRAGANCA Board President
SUSAN W JACOBS Treasurer
DR IRVING H PLOTKIN Secretary
WAYNE DAVIS Board Member
WILLA BODMAN Board Member
LINDA CABOT BLACK Board Member
ALICIA COONEY Board Member
ALAN DYNNER Board Member
ANDREW EISENBERG Board Member
MIMI HEWLETT Board Member
AMELIA WELT KATZEN Board Member
MARIA J KROKIDAS Board Member
JEFFREY MARSHALL Board Member
ABIGAIL B MASON Board Member
A NEIL PAPPALARDO Board Member
E LEE PERRY Board Member
WILLIAM POUNDS Board Member
DAVID W SCUDDER Board Member
SUSAN R SHAPIRO Board Member
RAY STATA Board Member
ROBERT EASTMAN Board Member
ANNE M MORGAN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER TADGELL Board Member
LADY JULIET TADGELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 55 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.