Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 17.9% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 2.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 27.8% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 34.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 10.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 20.1% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 22.0% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 24.6% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2014 30.7% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 6.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 18.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 23.4% 47 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member
AMANDA FLORES Board Member
ELIZABETH OFTEN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member
GEORGE D BEHRAKIS Board Member
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President
THERESE O'CONNOR VICE PRESIDE
CARRIE MEIKLE VICE PRESIDE
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member
CAROL S DUNCAN Board Member
JUDITH MABRY Board Member
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member
DACEY ZOUZAS Board Member
GEORGE D BEHRAKIS Board Member
EDITH BURGER Board Member
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (60 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.