Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 17.9% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 2.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 27.8% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 34.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 — — 10.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 20.1% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 — — 22.0% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 — — 24.6% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2014 — — 30.7% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — 6.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 18.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 23.4% 47 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President —
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President —
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President —
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer —
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary —
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member —
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member —
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member —
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member —
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member —
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member —
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member —
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member —
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member —
AMANDA FLORES Board Member —
ELIZABETH OFTEN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President —
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President —
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President —
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer —
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary —
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member —
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member —
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member —
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member —
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member —
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member —
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member —
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member —
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President —
THERESE O'CONNOR Board President —
CARRIE MEIKLE Board President —
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer —
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary —
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member —
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member —
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member —
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member —
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member —
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member —
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member —
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member —
GEORGE D BEHRAKIS Board Member —
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOGOSIAN Board President Hidden
NANCY L DONAHUE Board President —
THERESE O'CONNOR VICE PRESIDE —
CARRIE MEIKLE VICE PRESIDE —
LOUISE GRIFFIN Treasurer —
FRANK MAKAREWICZ Secretary —
YUN-JU CHOI Board Member —
MICHAEL G CONWAY Board Member —
MARYANN CORAVOS Board Member —
VERONIKA DEMERS Board Member —
EILEEN DONOGHUE-O'CONNOR Board Member —
CAROL S DUNCAN Board Member —
JUDITH MABRY Board Member —
JACK MOYNIHAN Board Member —
GREG PENNINGTON Board Member —
R EDWARD ROACH Board Member —
DACEY ZOUZAS Board Member —
GEORGE D BEHRAKIS Board Member —
EDITH BURGER Board Member —
JOSEPH PYNE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 106 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 37 points below the peer median (45 vs. 82).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.