Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 59 Fragile Recovery
2017 57 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 59 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Deborah Sadler Board President
Patricia Taylor Board President
Jessalyn Sadler Correa Secretary
George Sadler Treasurer
Trisha Cabral Board Member
Erin Murphy Board Member
Aaron Gendreau Visco Board Member
Jared Robinson Board Member
David Faria Board Member
Nadine Goulet Board Member
Roberto SC Soares Board Member
Jason Gendreau Visco Board Member
Sean LaFontaine Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Cote Board President
Jose Cabral Board President
Alayne Chappell Treasurer
Trisha Cabral Board Member
Deborah Sadler Board Member
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member
Roberto SC Soares Board Member
George Sadler Board Member
Patricia Taylor Board Member
Serena Dupois Board Member
Sarah Gifford Secretary
David Faria Board Member
Erin Cote Board President
Jose Cabral Board President
Alayne Chappell Treasurer
Trisha Cabral Board Member
Deborah Sadler Board Member
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member
Roberto SC Soares Board Member
George Sadler Board Member
Patricia Taylor Board Member
Serena Dupois Board Member
Sarah Gifford Secretary
David Faria Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Cote Board President
Patricia Taylor Board President
Sarah Gifford Secretary
Alayne Chappell Treasurer
Trisha Cabral Board Member
Deborah Sadler Board Member
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member
Roberto SC Soares Board Member
Shauna Brosky Board Member
George Sadler Board Member
Elizabeth Teixeira Board Member
Jose Cabral Board Member
Jennifer DaPonte Board Member
Jillian Ledogar Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aaron Gendreau-Visco Board President
Patricia Taylor Board President
Heidi Garcia Secretary
Trisha Cabral Treasurer
Beverly Robinson Board Member
Deborah Sadler Board Member
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member
Erin Cote Board Member
John Nunes-Sylvia Board Member
George Sadler Board Member
Elizabeth Teixeira Board Member
Jose Cabral Board Member
Paula Arruda Board Member
Donna Klamkin Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (60 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.