Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 59 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 59 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Deborah Sadler Board President —
Patricia Taylor Board President —
Jessalyn Sadler Correa Secretary —
George Sadler Treasurer —
Trisha Cabral Board Member —
Erin Murphy Board Member —
Aaron Gendreau Visco Board Member —
Jared Robinson Board Member —
David Faria Board Member —
Nadine Goulet Board Member —
Roberto SC Soares Board Member —
Jason Gendreau Visco Board Member —
Sean LaFontaine Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Cote Board President —
Jose Cabral Board President —
Alayne Chappell Treasurer —
Trisha Cabral Board Member —
Deborah Sadler Board Member —
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member —
Roberto SC Soares Board Member —
George Sadler Board Member —
Patricia Taylor Board Member —
Serena Dupois Board Member —
Sarah Gifford Secretary —
David Faria Board Member —
Erin Cote Board President —
Jose Cabral Board President —
Alayne Chappell Treasurer —
Trisha Cabral Board Member —
Deborah Sadler Board Member —
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member —
Roberto SC Soares Board Member —
George Sadler Board Member —
Patricia Taylor Board Member —
Serena Dupois Board Member —
Sarah Gifford Secretary —
David Faria Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Cote Board President —
Patricia Taylor Board President —
Sarah Gifford Secretary —
Alayne Chappell Treasurer —
Trisha Cabral Board Member —
Deborah Sadler Board Member —
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member —
Roberto SC Soares Board Member —
Shauna Brosky Board Member —
George Sadler Board Member —
Elizabeth Teixeira Board Member —
Jose Cabral Board Member —
Jennifer DaPonte Board Member —
Jillian Ledogar Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aaron Gendreau-Visco Board President —
Patricia Taylor Board President —
Heidi Garcia Secretary —
Trisha Cabral Treasurer —
Beverly Robinson Board Member —
Deborah Sadler Board Member —
Jason Gendreau-Visco Board Member —
Erin Cote Board Member —
John Nunes-Sylvia Board Member —
George Sadler Board Member —
Elizabeth Teixeira Board Member —
Jose Cabral Board Member —
Paula Arruda Board Member —
Donna Klamkin Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 12 points below the peer median (50 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.