Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 16.6% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 19.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 18.9% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 34.0% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 21.6% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 15.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 11.2% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 13.5% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 61 Stable Decline Risk
2014 65 Stable Stable Watch
2013 14.3% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jodi Stevens Executive Dir. Hidden
Pippa Asker Board President
Darren Fredette Board President
Kate Corkum Secretary
David Hooke Treasurer
Kim Tirrell Board Member
Suzanne Bellanger Board Member
Cecily Cassum Board Member
Erin Zell Board Member
Sarah Mitchell Board Member
Kristina Schmid Callina Board Member
Ron Biever Board Member
Sharon Giblin Board Member
David Perry Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jodi Stevens Executive Dir. Hidden
Jennifer Webb Board President
Nathan Stewart Treasurer
Suzanne Bellanger Board Member
Wendy Cullum Board President
Holly McDonough Secretary
Anthi Frangiadis Board Member
Philip Tifft Board Member
Jack Boesen Board Member
Michael Malone Board Member
Kim Tirrell Board Member
Heather Parsons Board Member
MICHAEL SUDOFSKY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.