Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 9.8% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 9.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 7.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 10.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 8.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 11.0% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 5.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 52 Fragile Recovery
2014 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 8.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MONIQUE DUFFY Board Member Hidden
BO FOARD Treasurer
BETHANY RANQUIST MED Board President
SARAH SANCHEZ Secretary
GERALD STOCKMAN Board Member
KATE PURDIE Board Member
HAYDEN BUNKER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HALLIE FLOWER Executive Director Hidden
STEPHEN STEARNS FOUNDER (EMERITUS) Hidden
SADIE FISCHESSER Board President
DAVID DUNN Treasurer
SARAH GORDON-MACEY STUDENT REP
SCOTT GORDON-MACEY Board Member
PERRIN SCOTT Secretary
HAZEL KINNERSLEY STUDENT REP
KATEY EVEREST Board President
ANDREW MARCHEV Board President
COLIN GRUBE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in VT for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.