Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH BUCK EXECUTIVE DI Hidden
ANTHONY MAZZOCCHI EXECUTIVE DI —
ELIZABETH GOMBOSI Board Member —
KENNIE LYMAN Board Member —
KEVIN TALLY Treasurer —
NEVIN DAWSON Board Member —
GEORGE VALLEY Board Member —
TARA EPPINGER Board Member —
AUDREY DUNN Secretary —
MIMI HYMAN Board President —
ELLEN COHEN VICE PRESIDE —
PETER CHARIG Board Member —
PHIL EATON Board Member —
BRENT LEWIS Board Member —
ROBERT SARLY Board Member —
NANCY SHARKEY FOX Board Member —
ANASTASIA TSIOULCAS Board Member —
PUJA VOHRA Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH BUCK EXECUTIVE DI —
ANTHONY MAZZOCCHI EXECUTIVE DI —
BARBARA WANG Board Member —
MARY BARTOS Board Member —
JOHN ENGELS Board President —
TED SMOOT Secretary —
VICTORIA SANGER VICE PRESIDE —
ALEXANDER NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
ALICE NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
KRISTAN CYBRIWSKY Board Member —
KENNIE LYMAN Board Member —
KEVIN TALLY Treasurer —
DEBORAH BUCK EXECUTIVE DI —
ANTHONY MAZZOCCHI EXECUTIVE DI —
BARBARA WANG Board Member —
MARY BARTOS Board Member —
JOHN ENGELS Board President —
TED SMOOT Secretary —
VICTORIA SANGER VICE PRESIDE —
ALEXANDER NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
ALICE NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
KRISTAN CYBRIWSKY Board Member —
KENNIE LYMAN Board Member —
KEVIN TALLY Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH BUCK EXECUTIVE DI Hidden
ANTHONY MAZZOCCHI EXECUTIVE DI —
MARY BARTOS Board Member —
JOHN ENGELS Board President —
TED SMOOT Secretary —
VICTORIA SANGER VICE PRESIDE —
ALEXANDER NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
KRISTAN CYBRIWSKY Board Member —
KENNIE LYMAN Board Member —
AMOS CARIATI Board Member —
ELLEN COHEN Board Member —
PHIL EATON Board Member —
MIMI HYMAN Board Member —
ROBERT SARLY Board Member —
KEVIN TALLY Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH BUCK EXECUTIVE DI Hidden
ANTHONY MAZZOCCHI EXECUTIVE DI —
JAMES HARDING Treasurer —
BARBARA WANG Board Member —
MARY BARTOS Board Member —
JOHN ENGELS Board President —
TED SMOOT Secretary —
VICTORIA SANGER VICE PRESIDE —
ALEXANDER NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
ALICE NAKHIMOVSKY Board Member —
KRISTAN CYBRIWSKY Board Member —
KENNIE LYMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 165 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 38 points above the peer median (60 vs. 22).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.