Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY RAFFERTY Board Member Hidden
ANTHONY DIVITTIS Board Member
MARIA GRAZIANO-BICKERSTAFF Board Member
JAMES R OKONAK Board Member
KATHY SOBOTA Board Member
GEORGIA TEPPERT Board Member
ROSANNE BODZIAK Secretary
KATIE GEE VICE-PRESIDE
LEE MARKOSKY Board President
MARTY SINGER Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROSANNE BODZIAK Secretary Hidden
MARIA GRAZIANO - BICKERSTAFF Board Member
ANTHONY DIVITTIS Board Member
JAMES R OKONAK Board Member
KATHY RAFFERTY Board Member
KATHY SOBOTA Board Member
GEORGIA TEPPERT Board Member
LEE MARKOSKY Board President
KATIE MILLER VICE-PRESIDE
MARTY SINGER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 42 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 11 points above the peer median (45 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.