Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2011
2012
2013
2014
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATE RANTILLA | Board President | — | ||
| LYNNE RUST | Board President | — | ||
| WARREN HUTCHINSON | Treasurer | — | ||
| BETH FRANZEN | Secretary | — | ||
| LINDA CHMIELEWSKI | Board Member | — | ||
| SUZANNE COBLE | Board Member | — | ||
| JUDY DUEKER | Board Member | — | ||
| TOM EWING | Board Member | — | ||
| CAROLINE HALEY | Board Member | — | ||
| PEG HARTZ | Board Member | — | ||
| LENNY MATCZYNSKI | Board President | — | ||
| VENETTE WINSLOW | Board Member | — | ||
| KATE RANTILLA | Board President | — | ||
| LYNNE RUST | Board President | — | ||
| WARREN HUTCHINSON | Treasurer | — | ||
| BETH FRANZEN | Secretary | — | ||
| LENNY MATCZYNSKI | Board President | — | ||
| LINDA CHMIELEWSKI | Treasurer | — | ||
| MARGARET HARTZ | Board Member | — | ||
| JUDITH DUEKER | Board Member | — | ||
| VNETTE WINSLOW | Board Member | — | ||
| SUZANNE COBLE | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 65 other orgs in NH with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points below the peer median (5 vs. 34).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.