Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Thomas Yan Board President
Nithya Nagarajan Secretary
Wendy Shi Treasurer
Cecilia Aires Vice President
Sherri Osmond Vice President
Shilpy Kapoor Vice President
Rajee Subramanian Vice President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Angelina Sosa Treasurer
Rajee Subramanian Board President
Mimi Quan Secretary
Sara O'Gara Board President
Bal Kumar Board President
Shilpy Kapoor Board President
Thomas Yan Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Shilpy Kapoor Board President
Thomas Yan Board President
Angelina Sosa Treasurer
Rajee Subramanian Board President
Mimi Quan Secretary
Sara O'Gara Board President
Bal Kumar Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anupama Iyengar Treasurer
Jaya Subramanian Board President
Liz Sanchez Board President
Sara O'Gara Board President
Tracy Burgess Board President
Mimi Quan Secretary
Thomas Yan Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points above the peer median (90 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.