Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Yan | Board President | — | ||
| Nithya Nagarajan | Secretary | — | ||
| Wendy Shi | Treasurer | — | ||
| Cecilia Aires | Vice President | — | ||
| Sherri Osmond | Vice President | — | ||
| Shilpy Kapoor | Vice President | — | ||
| Rajee Subramanian | Vice President | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelina Sosa | Treasurer | — | ||
| Rajee Subramanian | Board President | — | ||
| Mimi Quan | Secretary | — | ||
| Sara O'Gara | Board President | — | ||
| Bal Kumar | Board President | — | ||
| Shilpy Kapoor | Board President | — | ||
| Thomas Yan | Board President | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilpy Kapoor | Board President | — | ||
| Thomas Yan | Board President | — | ||
| Angelina Sosa | Treasurer | — | ||
| Rajee Subramanian | Board President | — | ||
| Mimi Quan | Secretary | — | ||
| Sara O'Gara | Board President | — | ||
| Bal Kumar | Board President | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anupama Iyengar | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jaya Subramanian | Board President | — | ||
| Liz Sanchez | Board President | — | ||
| Sara O'Gara | Board President | — | ||
| Tracy Burgess | Board President | — | ||
| Mimi Quan | Secretary | — | ||
| Thomas Yan | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points above the peer median (90 vs. 40).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Net assets declined for 3 consecutive years of deficit spending; cash runway narrowing.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.