Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 6.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 7.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 10.2% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 6.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RENIA SHTERENBERG Executive Director Hidden
SARAH SMILEY Board Member
KELLY SCHEETZ Board Member
KIRSTEN ISMAIL Board Member
TIM MORIARTY Board Member
WREN SAUNDERS Board Member
THOMAS SCHWARTZ Board Member
BERNEY KUBETZ Board Member
RICHARD STURGEON Board Member
NATHAN LESSER Board Member
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board President
GREG LAFRANCOIS Board President
JENNIFER EASTMAN Treasurer
KAY RAND Secretary
JUSTIN FOURNIER Board Member
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member
KENYA HOPKINS Board Member
CHUNG SHUM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board President
JENNIFER EASTMAN Treasurer
KAY RAND Secretary
THOMAS GOWER Board President
CHARLES BURGER Board Member
EDWARD ALLMAN Board Member
BETH WIEMANN Board Member
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member
MATTHEW COBB Board Member
JENS RUETER Board Member
BOB CUTLER Board Member
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board Member
RUSS PATTON Board Member
CONRAD LUMM Board Member
BEN FOX Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board Member
RUSSELL PATTON Board Member
JENNIFER EASTMAN Board Member
BETH WIEMANN Board Member
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member
MATTHEW COBB Board Member
CONRAD LUMM Board Member
JENS RUETER Board Member
BOB CUTLER Board Member
NANCY ROWE Board Member
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board President
ERIC STEADMAN Treasurer
KAY RAND Secretary
THOMAS GOWER Board President
CHARLES BURGER Board Member
EDWARD ALLMAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
BERNARD KUBETZ Board President
ERIC STEADMAN Treasurer
SUE POTVIN Secretary
TODD BENOIT Board President
CHRISTINE CUBBERLEY Board Member
THOMAS GOWER Board Member
ROBERT HAND Board Member
RUSSELL PATTON Board Member
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board Member
BETH WIEMANN Board Member
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member
JAMES ADSIT Board Member
MATTHEW COBB Board Member
JUDY HORAN Board Member
JENS RUETER Board Member
BOB CUTLER Board Member
TIMOTHY GARRETT Board Member
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member
KAY RAND Board Member
WREN SAUNDERS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 29 other orgs in ME with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points above the peer median (60 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.